TY - JOUR N2 - Comparison studies of different measurement methods using a Coordinate Measuring Arm are presented. Studies were divided into two parts. The first was point measurements of contact and pseudo-scanning contact measurements. The second part consisted of point measurements of contact and non-contact scanning measurements. Contact research (point measurements and the pseudo-scanning) were accomplished with the use of PowerINSPECT software, whereas non-contact with use of Focus Handheld and Focus Inspection software. Handheld Focus was used to collect a point cloud and its processing, while the detection of set elements was made using the second software from the group of Focus. According to the developed procedure for both parts sample elements with known nominal values were measured (available CAD model of object of research). It became the basis for examining whether there are statistically significant differences between results of different methods in both parts. Statistical comparison of measurement methods was carried out using four tests: Comparison of Means, Comparison of Standard Deviations, Comparison of Medians and a Kolmogorov- Smirnov Test. L1 - http://www.journals.pan.pl/Content/89969/PDF/ratajczyk.pdf L2 - http://www.journals.pan.pl/Content/89969 PY - 2012 IS - No 3 EP - 552 DO - 10.2478/v10178-012-0047-2 KW - scanning KW - pseudo-scanning KW - measuring arm. A1 - Ratajczyk, Eugeniusz A1 - Rak, MichaƂ A1 - Kowaluk, Tomasz PB - Polish Academy of Sciences Committee on Metrology and Scientific Instrumentation DA - 2012 T1 - The influence of method of point collection on results with the use of a measuring arm SP - 541 UR - http://www.journals.pan.pl/dlibra/publication/edition/89969 T2 - Metrology and Measurement Systems ER -