Search results

Filters

  • Journals
  • Authors
  • Keywords
  • Date
  • Type

Search results

Number of results: 2
items per page: 25 50 75
Sort by:
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The objective of this study was to determine the suitability of the nanofi ltration (NF) process to recover the regenerating agent (NaOH) from spent solutions contaminated with organic compounds. NaOH recovery from 2 spent regenerant solutions after cleaning ultrafiltration (UF) membranes (polymeric 30 kDa, ceramic 300 kDa) fouled with natural humic water was carried out using 2 types of NF membranes: NP010P (Na2SO4 rejection: 35–75%) and NP030P (Na2SO4 rejection: 80–95%). It has been shown that the use of the NP030P membrane allows for very high separation effi ciency of organic compounds (up to 97% of color intensity reduction) from the tested solutions. It was also observed that the effectiveness of the process, in addition to the type of membrane used, also depends on the time of NF process – along with the elapsed time of the process, the hydraulic and separation properties of the tested membranes deteriorated. The obtained results showed that the use of both tested NF membranes allows for the recovery of NaOH to a degree that allows its re-use.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Agnieszka Urbanowska
Małgorzata Kabsch-Korbutowicz
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The necessity of rational water resource management and reduction of water consumption demandsthat water utilities address water losses during water treatment. Therefore, the backwash water generated during the filtration process is often the focus of research aimed at its reuse within the water treatment system. The studies outlined here were conducted in a large water treatment plant (100,000 m3), focusing on the backwash water produced from sand bed filter flushing. Prior to its reintroduction into the treatment train, the backwash water underwent pre-treatment using ultrafiltration (UF) process with two different modules: a spiral module with a PVFD (200kDa) membrane and a capillary module with a PES (80kDa) membrane. The effectiveness of the process was evaluated based on the degree of retention of organic substances and microorganisms, which pose health risks in backwash water recirculation. The capillary membrane exhibited greater effectiveness in retaining these contaminants, thereby ensuring the complete elimination of pathogenic microorganisms. The study findings indicate that pre-treating backwash water using UF membranes and reintroducing it into the water treatment system before the ozonation process can lead to a reduction of environmental fees. However, this process results in a 1.5% increase in water treatment costs
Go to article

Bibliography

  1. Ahmed, A.E., Majewska-Nowak, K. & Grzegorzek, M. (2021). Removal of reactive dyes from aqueous solutions using ultrafiltration membranes, Environment Protection Engineering 47, 3, pp. 109-120. DOI:10.37190/epe210309.
  2. Alhussaini, M.A., Binger, Z., M. Souza-Chaves, B. M., Amusat, O.O., Park, J., Bartholomew, T.V., Gunter, D. & Achilli, A. (2023). Analysis of backwash settings to maximize net water production in an engineering-scale ultrafiltration system for water reuse, Journal of Water Process Engineering 53, 103761. DOI:10.1016/j.jwpe.2023.103761.
  3. Chen, M., Shen, S., Zhang, F., Zhang, C. & Xiong, J. (2022). Biodegradable dissolved organic carbon (BDOC) removal from micro-polluted water source using ultrafiltration: comparison with conventional processes, operation conditions and membrane fouling control, Polymers. 14, 21, 4689. DOI:10.3390/polym14214689.
  4. Clostridium perfringens- An overview. https://microbenotes.com/clostridium-perfringens/ Accessed January 19, 2024.
  5. Collivignarelli, M.C., Abbà, A., Benigna, I., Sorlini, S. & Torretta, V. (2017) Overview of the main disinfection processes for wastewater and drinking water treatment plants. Sustainability, 10, 86.
  6. Cordier, C., Stavrakakis, C., Morga, B., Degrémont, L., Voulgaris, A., Bacchi, A., Sauvade, P., Coelho, F. & Moulin, P. (2020). Removal of pathogens by ultrafiltration from sea water, Environment international, 142, 105809. DOI:10.1016/j.envint.2020.105809.
  7. Ćurko, J., Mijatović, I., Rumora, D., Crnek, V., Matošić, M. & Nežić, M. (2013). Treatment of spent filter backwash water from drinking water treatment with immersed ultrafiltration membranes, Desalination and Water Treatment, 51, 25-27, pp. 4901-4906. DOI:10.1080/19443994.2013.774142.
  8. de Souza, F.H., Pizzolatti, B.S. & Sens, M.L. (2021). Backwash as a simple operational alternative for small-scale slow sand filters: From conception to the current state of the art, Journal of Water Process Engineering 40, 101864. DOI:10.1016/j.jwpe.2020.101864.
  9. Ebrahimi, M.M., Amin, H., Pourzamani, Y., Hajizadeh, A.H., Mahvi, M.M. & Rad, M.H.R. (2017). Hybrid coagulation-UF processes for spent filter backwash water treatment: a comparison studies for PAFCl and FeCl 3 as a pre-treatment, Environmental monitoring and assessment, 189, pp. 1-15.DOI:10.1007/s10661-017-6091-3. [Online]. Available: link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10661-017-6091-3. Accessed 26 March 2024
  10. EPA United States Environmental Protection Agency. Drinking Water Treatment Plant Residuals Management Technical Report, Summary of Residuals Generation, Treatment, and Disposal at Large Community Water Systems. 2011.
  11. Gottfried, A., Shepard, A.D., Hardiman, K. & Walsh, M.E. (2008). Impact of recycling filter backwash water on organic removal in coagulation–sedimentation processes, Water Research, 42, 18, pp. 4683–4691. DOI:10.1016/j.watres.2008.08.011.
  12. Guidelines for drinking-water quality. 4th edition. 2017. Accessed January 19, 2024. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241549950.
  13. Guidelines to support the application of Regulation 2020/741 on minimum requirements for water reuse (including Annexes). (2022/C 298/01). 2020. Accessed January 19, 2024. https://environment.ec.europa.eu/publications/minimum-requirements-water-reuse-guidelines_en.
  14. Howe, K.J. & Clark, K. (2002). Fouling of microfiltration and ultrafiltration membranes by natural waters, Environ. Sci. Technol. 36, 16, pp. 3571-3576. DOI:10.1021/es025587r
  15. Li, W., Liang, X., Duan, J., Beechamb, S. & Mulcahy, D. (2018). Influence of spent filter backwash water recycling on pesticide removal in a conventional drinking water treatment process, Environmental Science Water Research & Technology, 4, pp. 1057-1067. DOI:10.1039/C7EW00530J.
  16. Lin, T., Zhang, J. & Chen, W. (2017). Recycling of activated carbon filter backwash water using ultrafiltration: membrane fouling caused by different dominant interfacial forces, Journal of Membrane Science, 544, pp. 174-185. DOI:10.1016/j.memsci.2017.09.028.
  17. Liu, P.Y., Chin, L.K., Ser, W., Ayi, T.C., Yap, P.H., Bourouina, T. & Leprince-Wang, Y. (2014). Real-time measurement of single bacterium’s refractive index using optofluidic immersion refractometry, Procedia Engineering, 87, pp. 356-359. DOI:10.1016/j.proeng.2014.11.743.
  18. Mahdavi, M., Ebrahimi, A., Azarpira, H., Tashauoei, H.R. & Mahvi, A.H. (2017). Dataset on the spent filter backwash water treatment by sedimentation, coagulation and ultrafiltration, Data in Brief, 15, pp. 916-921. DOI:10.1016/j.dib.2017.10.062.
  19. Mahmud, M., Elma, M., Rampun, E.L.A., Rahma, A., Pratiwi, A.E., Abdi, C. & Rossadi, R. (2020). Effect of two stages adsorption as pre-treatment of natural organic matter removal in ultrafiltration process for peat water treatment, Materials Science Forum, 988, pp. 114–121. DOI:10.4028/www.scientific.net/msf.988.114.
  20. Masotti, L. (2011). Depurazione Della Acque—Tecniche ed Impianti per il Trattamento Delle Acque di Rifiuto; Ed. Calderini: Milano, Italy.
  21. Mazuki Mohamad, N.I., Teow, Y.H., Ho, K.C. & Mohammad, A.W. (2020). Techno-economic analysis of single disinfection units and integrated disinfection systems for sewage effluent reclamation, J. Water Proc. Eng. 36, 101398. DOI:10.1016/j.jwpe.2020.101398.
  22. Microbentos. https://microbenotes.com/clostridium-perfringens/ Accessed 20.12.2023.
  23. Peters, C.D., Rantissi, T., Gitis, V. & Hankins, N.P. (2021). Retention of natural organic matter by ultrafiltration and the mitigation of membrane fouling through pre-treatment, membrane enhancement, and cleaning -A review, Journal of Water Process Engineering, 44, 102374. DOI:10.1016/j.jwpe.2021.102374.
  24. Qian, Y., Shi, Y., Guo, J., Chen, Y., Hanigan, D. & Dong, A.(2023) Molecular characterization of disinfection byproduct precursors in filter backwash water from 10 drinking water treatment plants. Science of The Total Environment, 856, 159027. DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.159027
  25. Radzymińska-Lenarcik, E., Urbaniak, W. & Totczyk, G. (2019). Sludge management after water treatment processes, Water Supply and Water Quality: pp. 995-1004. (in Polish). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/331967930_ZAGOSPODAROWANIE_OSADOW_POKOAGULACYJNYCH_POWSTALYCH_W_PROCESIE_UZDA_TNIANIA_WODY. Accessed January 19, 2024.
  26. Reissmann, F. G. & Uhl, W. (2006). Ultrafiltration for the reuse of spent filter backwash water from drinking water treatment, Desalination 198, 1–3, pp. 225-235. DOI:10.1016/j.desal.2006.03.517
  27. Shafiquzzaman, M., AlSaleem, S.S., Haider, H., Alresheedi, M.T. & Thabit H. (2021). Experimental study for sand filter backwash water management: low-cost treatment for recycling and residual sludge utilization for radium removal, Water, 13, 2799. DOI:10.3390/w13202799.
  28. Sosnowski, T., Suchecka, T. & Piątkiewicz, W. (2004). Penetration of the cell through the microfitration membrane, in Environmental Engineering Committee Monographs. [ed.] Polish Academy of Sciences. Environmental Engineering Committee. 22: pp. 359-367.
  29. Subasi, Y. & Cicek, C. (2017). Recent advances in hydrophilic modification of PVDF ultrafiltration membranes – a review: part I, Membrane Technology 10, pp. 7-12. DOI:10.1016/S0958-2118(17)30191-X.
  30. Sun, Y., Wu, M., Tong, T., Liu, P., Tang, P., Gan, Z., Yang, P., He, H. & Liu B. (2021). Organic compounds in Weiyuan shale gas produced water: identification, detection and rejection by ultrafiltration-reverse osmosis processes, Chemical Engineering Journal, 412, 128699. DOI:10.1016/j.cej.2021.128699.
  31. Turan, M. (2023). Backwashing of granular media filters and membranes for water treatment: a review, AQUA-Water Infrastructure, Ecosystems and Society, 72, 3, pp. 274-298. DOI:10.2166/aqua.2023.207.
  32. Wang, D., Zhou, J., Lin, H., Chen, J., Qi, J., Bai, Y. & Qu, J. (2023). Impacts of backwashing on micropollutant removal and associated microbial assembly processes in sand filters, Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 17, 3, 34. DOI:10.1007/s11783-023-1634-z.
  33. Wolska, M. & Urbańska-Kozłowska, H. (2023). Assessing the Possibilities of Backwash Water Reuse Filters in the Water Treatment System—Case Analysis, Water, 15, 13, 2452. DOI:10.3390/w15132452.
  34. Zhou, Z., Yang, Y., Li, X., Su, Z., Liu, Y., Ren, Y. & Zhang, Y. (2015) Effect of recycling filter backwash water on characteristic variability of dissolved organic matter in coagulation sedimentation process, Desalination and Water Treatment, 53, pp. 48-56, DOI:10.1080/19443994.2013.836994.
  35. Zielina, M. & Dąbrowski, W. (2021). Energy and water savings during backwashing of rapid filter plants, Energies, 14, 13, 3782. DOI:10.3390/en14133782.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Małgorzata Wolska
1
ORCID: ORCID
Małgorzata Kabsch-Korbutowicz
1
ORCID: ORCID
Małgorzata Solipiwko-Pieścik
1
ORCID: ORCID
Halina Urbanska-Kozłowska
2
ORCID: ORCID
Zbigniew Ferenc
1
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Poland
  2. MPWiK S.A we Wrocławiu, Poland

This page uses 'cookies'. Learn more