Search results

Filters

  • Journals
  • Authors
  • Keywords
  • Date
  • Type

Search results

Number of results: 10
items per page: 25 50 75
Sort by:
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to derive the characteristics of an effective governance framework ensuring incentives for conducting a prudent fiscal policy.We study this problem with the use of econometric tools and a sample of 28 European Union Member States between 2003 and 2017. By looking at specific reforms and measures, not only we verify the synthetic effectiveness of fiscal constraints but also we analyse specific elements of the governance framework.Our study shows that fiscal balances are affected not only by the economic cycle, but, among others, by the level of public debt and its cost. We find that the existence of numerical fiscal rules, in that specifically revenue and expenditures rules, their strong legal entrenchment, surveillance mechanisms, sanctions, and flexibility with respect to business cycle have a significant impact on curbing deficits.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Grzegorz Poniatowski
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The global financial and European debt crises exposed the need for a new approach to fiscal modeling to support decision making analytically. With this purpose, in the following paper we present a macro-fiscal model. By capturing macro-fiscal interlinkages, especially those between fiscal variables and exchange rates, the model enables to analyze various fiscal scenarios with the focus of its impact on debt sustainability and real sector, as well as to conduct forecasting exercises, for small open economies with potentially large share of foreign currency denominated debt in the overall public debt. Finally, the model is applied to Georgian economy to interpret its’ historical data, provide an optimal policy path for future and analyze debt sustainability under several stress scenarios.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Shalva Mkhatrishvili
Zviad Zedginidze
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The rapid surge of global oil prices, on account of the pent-up demand after COVID-19 and the Russian-Ukraine war, has significantly contributed to the cost-push inflation as well as twin deficits, predominantly in developing economies. Motivated by the intention to curb the inflation, governments of several oil-dependent economies have rolled out fiscal measures to provide immediate relief to households through subsidizing the fuel component of the consumption basket. This paper provides a case study of Pakistan, wherein the effectiveness of untargeted gasoline and diesel subsidies has been gauged against alternative direct disbursement mechanisms. The analysis reveals that under the price-control based indirect subsidy disbursement mechanism, only 11% of the total domestic subsidies were directed to the poorest 40% of the households, whereas approximately 55% of the total subsidies were allocated to the 20% of the most liquid household segment. The case study analyzes the performance of alternative direct subsidy disbursement mechanisms which transpires into the potential fiscal savings of PKR 74.63 billion, while providing coverage to 40% of the lowest household segment. The study also evaluates the implication of the pass-through of the true prices on the national consumption of gasoline and diesel in the short-term, which reveals the sharp reduction of petroleum consumption in the total bill from 37% to 23%, thereby providing substantial relief to the current account balance. The finding provides key insights for economies to institutionalize the necessary social protection system and progressively transit to the direct subsidy disbursement mechanism while striving to contain the cost-push-based inflation triggered through the rapid movement of global oil prices.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Talha Khalid
1
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Policy and Planning, Central Power Purchasing Agency, Pakistan
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Indian states exhibit considerable heterogeneity in terms of revenue mobilizing capacities and efforts, development spending and fiscal dependence on the central government. In this context, the paper compares the fiscal performance of major Indian states in terms of two non-parametric performance evaluation models for the period 2009–10 to 2014–15. The study thus uses the conventional two stage framework for efficiency evaluation as well as the two stage conditional performance model. The outcomes enable us to identify front-runners as well as laggards in the area of fiscal management. Further, the study showed that the gross capital formation experienced by the states significantly influences state performance in India. However, the impact of outstanding liabilities on efficiency performance was statistically insignificant.
Go to article

Bibliography

[1] Acharya D., Sahoo B. K., (2017), Dynamic Macroeconomic Performance of Indian States: Some Post-Reform Evidence [in:] Regional Growth and Sustainable Development in Asia. New Frontiers in Regional Science: Asian Perspectives, [eds.:] Batabyal A. A., Nijkamp P., Springer International Publishing Switzerland.
[2] Banker R. D., (1993), Maximum Likelihood, Consistency and Data Envelopment Analysis: A Statistical Foundation, Management Science 39(10), 1265–1273.
[3] Banker R. D., Charnes A., Cooper W. W., (1984), Some models for estimating technical and scale efficiency, Management Science 30(9), 1078–1092.
[4] Banker R. D., Natarajan R, (2008), Evaluating contextual variables affecting productivity using data envelopment analysis, Operations Research 56(1), 48–58.
[5] Banker R. D., Natarajan R., Zhang, D., (2019), Two-stage estimation of the impact of con- textual variables in stochastic frontier production function models using data envelopment analysis: second stage OLS versus bootstrap approaches, European Journal of Operational Research 278(2), 368–84.
[6] Barro R. J., (1990), Government spending in a simple model of endogenous growth, Journal of Political Economy 98, S103–S125.
[7] Barro R. J., (1991), Economic growth in a cross section of countries, Quarterly Journal of Economics 106, 407–444.
[8] Bhide S., Manoj P., (2002), Evaluating Quality of Budgets with a Composite Index, Economic and Political Weekly 37(13), 1177–1180.
[9] Bjurek H., Kjulin U., Gustafsson B., (1992), Efficiency, productivity and determinants of inefficiency at public day care centers in Sweden. Scandinavian Journal of Economics 94 (Supplement), 173–187.
[10] Basílio M. S., Pires M. C. P., Reis J. F. P., (2016), Portuguese banks’ performance: comparing efficiency with their Spanish counterparts, Eurasian Economic Review 6(1), 27–44, https://doi.org/10.1007/ s40822-015-0033-6.
[11] Battese G. E., Coelli T. J., (1995), A model for technical inefficiency effects in a stochastic frontier production function for panel data, Empirical Economics 20 (2), 325–332.
[12] Charnes A., Cooper W. W., Rhodes E. (1978), Measuring Efficiency of Decision Making Unit, European Journal of Operational Research 2(6), 429–444.
[13] Chillingerian J. A., (1995), Evaluating physician efficiency in hospitals: A multivariate analysis of best practices. European Journal of Operational Research 80, 548–574.
[14] Coondoo D., Majumder A., Mukherjee R., Neogi C., (2001), Relative Tax Performances-Analysis for Selected States in India, Economic and political weekly 36(40), 3869–3871.
[15] Devarajan S., Swaroop V., Heng-fu Z.,(1996), The composition of public expenditure and economic growth, Journal of Monetary Economics 37(2-3), 313– 344.
[16] Dholakia A., (2005), Measuring Fiscal Performance of Indian States An Alternative Approach, Economic and Political Weekly 40(30), 3421-28.
[17] Dholakia R. H., Karan N., (2004), Consistent Measurement of Fiscal Deficit and Debt of States in India, Working Paper WP 2004-07-05, Indian Institute of Management, Ahmedabad.
[18] Diamond J., (1989), Government expenditure and economic growth: An empirical investigation, IMF working paper no. 89/45, International Monetary Fund, Washington, DC.
[19] Efron B., (1979), Bootstrap Methods: Another Look at the Jackknife, Annals of Statistics 7(1), 1–26.
[20] Erden L., Holcombe R. G., (2005), The Effects of Public Investment on Private Investment In Developing Economies, Public Finance Review 33(5), 575–602.
[21] Färe R., Grosskopf S., Lovell C. A. K., (1994), Production Frontiers, Cambridge University Press.
[22] Färe R., Grosskopf S., (1985), A Nonparametric Cost Approach to Scale Efficiency, The Scandinavian Journal of Economics 87(4), 594–604.
[23] Farrell M. J., (1957), The Measurement of Productive Efficiency, Journal of The Royal Statistical Society, Series A, General, 120(3), 253–281.
[24] Garg S., Goyal A., Rupayan P., (2017), Why Tax Effort Falls Short of Tax Capacity in Indian States, Public Finance Review 45(2), 232–259.
[25] Goyal R., Khundrakpam J., Ray P., (2004), Is India’s Public Finance Unsustainable? Or, Are the Claims Exaggregated?, Journal of Policy Modelling 26, 401–420.
[26] Jha R., Mohanty, M., Chatterjee S., Chitkara P., (1999), Tax efficiency in selected Indian states, Empirical Economics 24(4), 641–654.
[27] Klopp G. A., (1985), The analysis of the efficiency of production system with multiple inputs and output, PhD dissertation, University of Illinois, Industrial and System Engineering College, Chicago.
[28] Koopmans T. C., (1951), An Analysis of Production as an Efficient Combination of Activities [in:] Activity Analysis of Production and Allocation, [ed.:] Koopmans T. C., New York Cowles Commission for Research in Economics, Monograph No. 13, John Wiley and Sons.
[29] Mohanty A,. Mishra B. R., (2016), Fiscal Performance Index of the States in India, Prajnan 44(3), 247–267.
[30] Mohanty R. K., Sahoo B. K., Chaudhuri P. K., (2020), Assessing the (eco)macroeconomic performance index of India: A data envelopment analysis approach, Public Affairs, https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.2122.
[31] Mundle S., Chowdhury S., Sikdar S., (2016), Governance Performance of Indian States 2001–02 and 2011–12, NIPFP Working Paper No. 2016-164.
[32] Rajaraman I., Bhide S., Pattnaik R. K., (2005), A Study of Debt Sustainability at State Level in India, Reserve Bank of India.
[33] Rangarajan C., Prasad A., (2012), Managing State Debt and Ensuring Solvency- The Indian Experience, WPS6039, Policy Research Working Paper, The World Bank, Economic Policy and Debt Department.
[34] Ramirez M. D., (2004), Is public infrastructure spending productive in the Mexican case? A vector error correction analysis, The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development 13(2), 159–178.
[35] Ray S. C., Neogi C., (2007), A Non-Radial Measure of Efficiency in Indian Textile Industry: An Analysis of Unit-level Data, working paper No. 38, Department of Economics, University of Connecticut, USA.
[36] Reserve Bank of India, (2018), State Finances-A Study of State Budgets 2015–16, RBI, Mumbai.
[37] Reserve Bank of India, (2017), State Finances-A Study of State Budgets 2014–15, RBI, Mumbai.
[38] Sahoo B. K., Acharya D., (2012), Constructing macroeconomic performance index of Indian states using DEA, Journal of Economic Studies 39(1), 63–83.
[39] Shephard R. W., (1953), Cost and Productions, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
[40] Shephard R. W., (1970), Theory of Cost and Productions, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
[41] Shephard R. W., (1974), Indirect Production Functions, Meisenheim am Glan, Verlag Anton Hain.
[42] Sinha R. P., (2017), Fiscal Performance Benchmarking of Indian States – a Robust Frontier Approach, Central European Review of Economics and Management 1(4), 225–249.
[43] Sinha R. P., (2018), Fiscal Performance of Indian States – a Comparison of Convex and Non-Convex Frontier Approaches, Journal of Governance & Public Policy 8(2), 2–17.
[44] Silverman B. W., (1986), Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis, Chapman and Hall, New York, NY.
[45] Simar L., Wilson P. W., (1998), Sensitivity Analysis of Efficiency Scores: How to Bootstrap in Nonparametric Frontier Models, Management Science 44(11), 49–61.
[46] Simar L., Wilson P. W., (2000), A general methodology of bootstrapping in Nonparametric Frontier Models, Journal of Applied Statistics 27(6), 779–802.
[47] Simar L., Wilson P. W., (2007), Estimation and inference in two-stage, semiparametric models of productive efficiency, Journal of Econometrics 136(1), 31– 64.
[48] Simar L., Wilson P. W., (2011), Two-stage DEA: caveat emptor, Journal of Productivity Analysis 36(2), 205–218.
[49] Simm J., Besstremyannaya G., (2016), “Package ‘rDEA’, Version 1.2-5”, available at: https://cran.rproject.org/web/packages/rDEA/rDEA.pdf.
[50] Simone A. S., Topalova P., (2009), India’s Experience with Fiscal Rules: An Evaluation and The Way Forward, IMF working paper no. 09/175, International Monetary Fund, Washington, DC.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Ram Pratap Sinha
1
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Government College of Engineering and Leather Technology, Kolkata, India
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The local aspect of aging is often ignored. However, municipalities, in particular cities will be affected by the consequences of population aging, in particular a decrease in tax revenues and an increase of expenditures on public goods demanded by the elderly. In this paper we use a static general equilibrium model to analyse the impact of aging on city’s finances. We show that an increase in the number of pensioners will raise the cost of public goods. However, an increase in the number of working elderly can alleviate the situation.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Aleksandra Wąsowicz
Grzegorz Kula
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

This paper aims to investigate the impact of exogenous fiscal policies on the Indonesian main macroeconomic indicators and the implications on different institutions and sectors in the economy using the static Computable General Equilibrium (CGE) analysis. Three simulations are conducted in order to analyze the expansion of exogenous public spending. The results revealed that the increase of government expenditure on goods under the adjusted government deficit and balance of payment generates the highest improvement on Indonesian GDP but resulting an increase in government deficit. In contrast, under financing scheme of either lowering subsidy rates across activities or increasing the ad valorem tax rates would result in lower improvement on Indonesian GDP. This is because it directly escalates the cost of production and thus increases the prices of final goods purchased by the households which result in a fall in their real consumption and in turn eventually could lead to a decrease in national income.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Herbert W.V. Hasudungan
Sulthon S. Sabaruddin
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

This paper investigates the implications of the size of budget deficit in the open economy under perfect mobility of capital. For that purpose we construct a general equilibrium model with consumers maximizing the discounted utility of consumption, and firms maximizing profits. Government sets the size of the deficit relative to GDP and controls the structure of public debt. Using standard methods of optimal control theory we solve the model, i.e. we find explicit formulas for all trajectories and the level of welfare. Finally, we show that the higher the deficit-to-GDP ratio, the lower the welfare of consumers. Similarly, welfare increases with the share of foreign creditors in public debt.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Michał Konopczyński
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

In this paper we develop an open-economy endogenous growth model to examine the influence of fiscal policy on the economy in the long run. We allow for public deficit and 5 types of taxes. One of the novel features is separate treatment of interest rates on public and private debt, both of which are linear functions of appropriate debt-to-GDP ratios. Two extreme situations are analyzed: a model of “decentralized economy”, where economic agents do not take into account any externalities, and a model of “benevolent social planner”. We derive the rules of optimal fiscal policy that induce economic agents to internalize all externalities. Theoretical results are illustrated with an empirical analysis for Poland. The optimal values of several fiscal policy instruments for Poland are calculated.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Michał Konopczyński
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

This paper investigates the linkages between economic growth and fiscal policy under perfect capital mobility. The model incorporates wide range of fiscal policy instruments: the budget deficit, the structure of public debt, public expenditures on education, public consumption, and four tax rates. We prove that two tax rates - on consumption and interest on government bonds held by domestic lenders - are neutral for economic growth: both for the balanced growth path (BGP), and for transitory dynamics. All other parameters of fiscal policy are not neutral. Theoretical results are illustrated with an empirical analysis for Poland based on post-global financial crisis data for the Polish economy (2009-2018). Numerical simulations show that if fiscal policy remains unchanged, Polish economy will converge to the BGP with GDP growing at 2.3%. The best way to accelerate growth is to increase public investment in education. The other budgetary policy instruments are less effective in shaping economic growth.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Michał Konopczyński
1

  1. Poznań University of Economics, Poland
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

We consider fiscal and monetary policy interactions in a monetary unionunder monetary leadership, when the common central bank is concerned with theaverage fiscal stance of the union. We use a static two-country monetary unionmodel to investigate the policy-mix problem under different regimes of non-cooperation, cooperation, and enforced cooperation among fiscal authorities.We find that fiscal policy is unambiguously countercyclical, a feature that ismore pronounced under fiscal policy cooperation. Monetary policy can be eithercountercyclical or procyclical. A central bank concerned about the aggregatefiscal stance is effective in stabilizing output and central budget, but at theexpense of inflation stabilization.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Georgios Chortareas
Christos Mavrodimitrakis

This page uses 'cookies'. Learn more