Search results

Filters

  • Journals
  • Authors
  • Keywords
  • Date
  • Type

Search results

Number of results: 5
items per page: 25 50 75
Sort by:
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

In the paper, the problem of isothermic DNA sequencing by hybridization, without any errors in its input data, is presented and an exact polynomial-time algorithm solving the problem is described. The correctness of the algorithm is con.rmed by an enumerative proof.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

M. Kasprzak
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

DNA sequencing remains one of the most important problems in molecular and computational biology. One of the methods used for this purpose is sequencing by hybridization. In this approach usually DNA chips composed of a full library of oligonucleotides of a given length are used, but in principle it is possible to use another types of chips. Isothermic DNA chips, being one of them, when used for sequencing may reduce hybridization error rate. However, it was not clear if a number of errors following from subsequence repetitions is also reduced in this case. In this paper a method for estimating resolving power of isothermic DNA chips is described which allows for a comparison of such chips and the classical ones. The analysis of the resolving power shows that the probability of sequencing errors caused by subsequence repetitions is greater in the case of isothermic chips in comparison to their classical counterparts of a similar cardinality. This result suggests that isothermic chips should be chosen carefully since in some cases they may not give better results than the classical ones.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

P. Formanowicz
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Field and laboratory protocols that originally led to the success of published studies have previously been only briefly laid out in the methods sections of scientific publications. For the sake of repeatability, we regard the details of the methodology that allowed broad−range DNA studies on deep−sea isopods too valuable to be neglected. Here, a com− prehensive summary of protocols for the retrieval of the samples, fixation on board research vessels, PCR amplification and cycle sequencing of altogether six loci (three mitochondrial and three nuclear) is provided. These were adapted from previous protocols and developed especially for asellote Isopoda from deep−sea samples but have been successfully used in some other peracarids as well. In total, about 2300 specimens of isopods, 100 amphipods and 300 tanaids were sequenced mainly for COI and 16S and partly for the other markers. Although we did not set up an experimental design, we were able to analyze amplification and sequencing success of different methods on 16S and compare success rates for COI and 16S. The primer pair 16S SF/SR was generally reliable and led to better results than universal primers in all studied Janiroidea, except Munnopsidae and Dendrotionidae. The widely applied universal primers for the barcoding region of COI are problematic to use in deep−sea isopods with a success rate of 45–79% varying with family. To improve this, we recommend the development of taxon−specific primers.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Torben Riehl
Nils Brenke
Saskia Brix
Amy Driskell
Stefanie Kaiser
Angelika Brandt
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

In recent years, two developments revolutionized the molecular genetics. The first one is an enormously improved technique of the DNA sequencing. It is now possible to obtain in couple of hours and on the low cost, the full sequence of the human genome. The second one is the invention of the CRISPR-Cas technique, which allows the precise manipulations of genomes of living organisms. This technique was already successfully applied to “repair” human genes responsible for hereditary diseases. To some astonishment, applications of genetic engineering to humans does not bring protests of general public, while similar manipulations pf plants genomes are considered an dangerous. In Poland and in some other countries, parliaments introduced an extremely restrictive laws, which in practice makes cultivation of GM plants outside laboratories impossible. This is caused by the ignorance of the general public and by opposition of catholic church which considers genetic modifications of all organisms as contradictory with Gods will. The most common modification of plants is an introduction into their genomes of the single gene from the bacterium Bacillus thuringensis, what make the plant resistant to harmful insects. According to WHO, neither the manipulation mentioned above, nor manipulations of the other kind, do not pose any danger to humans.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Piotr Węgleński
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Mycoplasma bovis is a highly contagious pathogen that causes clinical or subclinical mastitis. The present study was aimed for the isolation, molecular characterization and antibiogram determination of M. bovis from raw milk samples. Milk samples were collected randomly from lactating cows and buffaloes from different tehsils of district Faisalabad, Pakistan. Samples were inoculated on modified Hayflick medium and biochemical tests were performed for further confirmation of isolated M. bovis. Out of total 400 milk samples, 184 (46%) samples were found positive for culture method. The 16S-rRNA gene polymerase chain reaction was performed for molecular characterization of isolated M. bovis strains. Out of total 400 milk samples, 240 (60%) positive for M. bovis through PCR method were examined. The 16S-rRNA gene PCR positive isolated M. bovis strains were sequenced and results were compared using Maximum-likelihood method and sequenced strains of M. bovis were aligned and analyzed by Clustal W software. Antibiogram of isolated M. bovis strains was analyzed by disc diffusion assay against eight commonly used antibiotics. Tylosin (30μg) and Tilmicosin (15ug) showed inhibition zones of 32.34 ± 1.10 mm and 17.12 ± 0.93 mm respectively against isolated M. bovis which were found sensitive. Isolated M. bovis was found resistant to other commonly used antibiotics. Statistical analysis revealed that p-value was < 0.05 and the odds ratio was >1.0 at 95% CI. This study complemented the lack of epidemiological knowledge of molecular characterization, comparative effectiveness and resistance trends of isolated M. bovis strains against commonly used antibiotics.
Go to article

Bibliography

  1. Adorno BM, Salina A, Joaquim S, Guimarães FF, Lopes BC, Menozzi B, Langoni H (2021) Presence of Mollicutes and Mycoplasma bovis in nasal swabs from calves and in milk from cows with clinical mastitis. Vet Zootec 28: 001-009.
  2. Ahmad Z, Babar S, Abbas F, Awan MA, Abubakar M, Attique MA, Hassan Y, Rashid N, Ali M (2011) Identification and molecular characterization of Mycoplasma species from bovine lungs samples collected from slaughter house, Quetta, Balochistan, Pakistan. Pak J Life Soc Sci 9: 91-97.
  3. Ahmad Z, Babar S, Abbas F, Awan MA, Shafee M, Tariq MM, Mengal MA, Rashid N, Amin S, Taj K, Ali M (2014) Prevalence of Mycoplasma bovis in respiratory tract of cattle slaughtered in Balochistan, Pakistan. Pak Vet J 34: 46-49.
  4. Alhussen MA, Kirpichenko VV, Yatsentyuk SP, Nesterov AA, Byadovskaya OP, Zhbanovat TV, Sprygin AV (2021) Mycoplasma bovis, M. bovigenitalium and M. dispar as Bovine Pathogens: Brief characteristics of the pathogens (review). Agric Biol 56: 245-260.
  5. Kumar A, Verma AK, Gangwar NK, Rahal A (2012) Isolation, characterization and antibiogram of Mycoplasma bovis in sheep pneumonia. Asian J Anim Vet Adv 7: 149-157.
  6. Behera S, Rana R, Gupta PK, Kumar D, Sonal, Rekha V, Arun TR, Jena D (2018) Development of real- time PCR assay for the detection of Mycoplasma bovis. Trop Anim Health Prod 50: 875-882.
  7. Bokma J, Vereecke N, De Bleecker K, Callens J, Ribbens S, Nauwynck H, Haesebrouck F, Theuns S, Boyen F, Pardon B (2020) Phylogenomic analysis of Mycoplasma bovis from Belgian veal, dairy and beef herds. Vet Res 51: 121.
  8. Bokma J, Vereecke N, Nauwynck H, Haesebrouck F, Theuns S, Pardon B, Boyen F (2021) Genome-wide association study reveals genetic markers for antimicrobial resistance in Mycoplasma bovis. Microbiol Spectr 9: e0026221.
  9. Buller H, Blokhuis H, Jensen P, Keeling L (2018) Towards farm animal welfare and sustainability. Animals 2018, 8: 81.
  10. Caria M, Boselli C, Murgia L, Rosati R, Pazzona A (2013) Influence of low vacuum levels on milking characteristics of sheep, goat and buffalo. J Agr Eng 44: 217- 220.
  11. Cheng WN, Han SG (2020) Bovine mastitis: risk factors, therapeutic strategies, and alternative treatments – A review. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci . 33: 1699-1713.
  12. Deeney A S, Collins R, Ridley AM (2021) Identification of Mycoplasma species and related organisms from ruminants in England and Wales during 2005-2019. BMC Vet Res 17: 325.
  13. Farid MA, Abo-Shosha AA, Belal ES, Hassan MM (2018) Genotyping of pathogenic Mycoplasma bovis isolated from cattle in Kafr El-Sheikh Province, Egypt. J Pure Appl Microbiol. 12: 2103-2109.
  14. Ghafar A, Mcgill D, Stevenson MA, Badar M, Kumbher A, Warriach MH, Gasser RB, Jabbar A (2020) A participatory investigation of bovine health and production issues in Pakistan. Front Vet Sci 7: 248.
  15. Hata E, Harada T, Itoh M (2019) Relationship between antimicrobial susceptibility and multilocus sequence type of Mycoplasma bovis isolates and development of a method for rapid detection of point mutations involved in decreased susceptibility to macrolides, lincosamides, tetracyclines, and spectinomycin. Appl Environ Microbiol 85: e0057519.
  16. Hudzicki J (2009) Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion susceptibility test protocol. Am J Mol Biol 8: 2009.
  17. Ilyas F, Gillani DQ, Yasin M, Iqbal MA, Javed I, Ahmad S, Nabi I (2022) Impact of Livestock and Fisheries on Economic Growth: An Empirical Analysis from Pakistan. Sarhad J Agric 38: 160-169.
  18. Imandar M, Pourbakhsh SA, Jamshidian M, Salehi TZ (2018) Isolation, identification and molecular characterization of Mycoplasma bovis in mastitic dairy cattle by PCR and culture methods. J Hell Vet Med Soc 69: 815-822.
  19. Imran M, Rehman I, Sulehria AQ, Butt YM, Khan AM, Ziauddin A (2021) Profile of Antimicrobial Susceptibility from Cattles’s Milk Isolates Suffering from Mastitis in District Lahore. J Biores Manag 8: 6-14.
  20. Khan ZU (2022) Laws, Issues, Challenges, Analysis of Livestock Sector and International Best Practices. J Dev Soc Sci 3: 271-283.
  21. Klein U, de Jong A, Moyaert H, El Garch F, Leon R, Richard-Mazet A, Rose M, Maes D, Pridmore A, Thomson JR, Ayling RD (2017) Antimicrobial susceptibility monitoring of Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae and Mycoplasma bovis isolated in Europe. Vet Microbiol 204: 188-193.
  22. Konigsson MH, Bolske G, Johansson KE (2002) Intraspecific variation in the 16S- rRNA gene sequences of Mycoplasma agalactiae and Mycoplasma bovis strains. Vet Microbiol 85: 209-220.
  23. Mahmood F, Khan A, Hussain R, Khan IA, Abbas RZ, Ali HM, Younus M (2017) Patho-bacteriological investigation of an outbreak of Mycoplasma bovis infection in calves-Emerging stealth assault. Microb Pathog 107: 404-408.
  24. Maunsell FP, Donovan GA, (2009) Mycoplasma bovis infections in young calves. Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract 25: 139-177.
  25. Maunsell FP, Woolums AR, Francoz D, Rosenbusch RF, Step DL, Wilson DJ, Janzen ED (2011) Mycoplasma bovis infections in cattle. J Vet Inter Med 25: 772-783.
  26. Mojsoska B, Ghoul M, Perron GG, Jenssen H, Alatraktchi FA (2021) Changes in toxin production of environmental Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates exposed to sub- inhibitory concentrations of three common antibiotics. PloS One 16: e0248014.
  27. Nicholas RA, Fox LK, Lysnyansky I (2016) Mycoplasma mastitis in cattle: To cull or not to cull. Vet J 216: 142-147.
  28. Niu J, Wang D, Yan M, Chang Z, Xu Y, Sizhu S, Li Z, Hu S, Bi D (2021) Isolation, identification and biological characteristics of Mycoplasma bovis in yaks. Microb Pathog 150: 104691.
  29. Pal A, Chakravarty AK (2020) Disease resistance for different livestock species. Genet Breed Dis Resist Livest 2020: 271-296.
  30. Passchyn P, Piepers S, De Meulemeester L, Boyen F, Haesebrouck F, De Vliegher S (2012) Between-herd prevalence of Mycoplasma bovis in bulk milk in Flanders, Belgium Res Vet Sci 92: 219-220.
  31. Perez-Casal J, Prysliak T, Maina T, Suleman M, Jimbo S (2017) Status of the development of a vaccine against Mycoplasma bovis. Vaccine 35: 2902-2907.
  32. Romero J, Benavides E, Meza C (2018) Assessing financial impacts of subclinical mastitis on Colombian dairy farms. Front Vet Sci 5: 273
  33. Rossetti BC, Frey J, Pilo P (2010) Direct detection of Mycoplasma bovis in milk and tissue samples by real-time PCR. Molar Cell Pro. 24: 321-323.
  34. Salina A, Timenetsky J, Barbosa MS, Azevedo CM, Langoni H (2020) Microbiological and molecular detection of Mycoplasma bovis in milk samples from bovine clinical mastitis. Pesqui Vet Bras 40: 82-87.
  35. Shao Y, Wang Y, Yuan Y, Xie Y (2021) A systematic review on antibiotics misuse in livestock and aquaculture and regulation implications in China. Sci Total Environ 798: 149205.
  36. Abadi AT, Rizvanov AA, Haertlé T, Blatt NL (2019) World Health Organization report: current crisis of antibiotic resistance. BioNanoScience 9: 778-788.
  37. Gogoi-Tiwari J, Tiwari HK, Wawegama NK, Premachandra C, Robertson ID, Fisher AD, Waichigio FK, Irons P, Aleri JW (2022) Prevalence of Mycoplasma bovis Infection in Calves and Dairy Cows in Western Australia. Vet Sci 9: 351-358.
  38. Vereecke N, Bokma J, Haesebrouck F, Nauwynck H, Boyen F, Pardon B, Theuns S (2020) High quality genome assemblies of Mycoplasma bovis using a taxon- specific Bonito basecaller for MinION and Flongle long-read nanopore sequencing. BMC Bioinform 21: 517.
  39. Verraes C, Claeys W, Cardoen S, Daube G, De Zutter L, Imberechts H, Dierick K, Herman L (2014) A review of the microbiological hazards of raw milk from animal species other than cows. Inter Dairy J 39: 121-130.
  40. Wisselink HJ, Smid B, Plater J, Ridley A, Andersson AM, Aspan A, Pohjanvirta T, Vahanikkila N, Larsen H, Hogberg J, Colin A, Tardy F (2019) A European interlaboratory trial to evaluate the performance of different PCR methods for Mycoplasma bovis diagnosis. BMC Vet Res 15: 86.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

A. Jabbar
1
M. Ashraf
1
S.U. Rahman
1
M.S. Sajid
2

  1. Institute of Microbiology, University of Agriculture, Jail Road, Faisalabad, Punjab 38000, Pakistan
  2. Department of parasitology, University of Agriculture, Jail Road, Faisalabad, Punjab 38000, Pakistan

This page uses 'cookies'. Learn more