Search results

Filters

  • Journals
  • Authors
  • Keywords
  • Date
  • Type

Search results

Number of results: 2
items per page: 25 50 75
Sort by:
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

This paper proposes a new approach for calculating the impulse response of room acoustics. Impulse response provides unique characterization of any discrete lineartime invariant (LTI) systems. We assume that the room is a linear time-invariant system and the impulse response is calculated simply by sending a Dirac Impulse into the system as input and getting the response from the output. Then, the output of the system is represented as a sum of time-shifted weighted impulse responses. Both mathematical justifications for the proposed method and results from simulation software developed to evaluate the proposed approach are presented in detail.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Adil Alpkocak
Malik Sis
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Mosques are Islamic places of worship where speech and music rituals are performed. Since two different languages are spoken there, mosques are described as bilingual spaces. Among studies on the complex acoustic structure of mosques there are only few studies on speech intelligibility and none on the bilingual characteristics of the mosque. Therefore, a comprehensive study has been carried out to evaluate the acoustic comfort of the contemporary Turkish mosques (CTM) over speech intelligibility of Turkish and Arabic languages. In the study the CTM model providing optimum acoustic conditions recommended in the literature is examined on speech intelligibility by applying acoustic simulation and auralisation techniques, as well as word recognition tests. As a result, the acoustic condition in the model is found insufficient in terms of speech intelligibility of both languages. Also, with the decrease of Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR), the Turkish intelligibility ratio is observed to decrease at least two times faster than the Arabic ones.
This study is viewed as an outline for researchers to further study mosque acoustics in terms of speech intelligibility, and thus support the standardisation process of the acoustic comfort criteria for the mosques.
Go to article

Bibliography

1. Abdou A.A. (2003), Measurement of acoustical characteristics of mosques in Saudi Arabia, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 113(3): 1505–1517, doi: 10.1121/1.1531982.
2. Ahmad Y., Din N.C., Othman R. (2013), Mihrab design and its basic acoustical characteristics of traditional vernacular mosques in Malaysia, Journal of Building Performance, 4(1): 44–51, http://spaj.ukm.my/ jsb/index.php/jbp/article/view/79.
3. Akın A. (2016), An essay about the function of mosques throughout the history [in Turkish: Tarihi Süreç Içinde Cami ve Fonksiyonlari Üzerine Bir Deneme], Hitit Üniversitesi Ilahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, 15(29): 179–211.
4. Alic E. (2019), A study on speech intelligibility of mosque over Turkish and Arabic language [in Turkish: Camilerde Konusma Anlasilabilirliginin Türkçe ve Arapça Dilleri Üzerinden Incelenmesi], Master Thesis, Eskisehir Technical University.
5. Alic E., Ozcevik Bilen A. (2019), Determination of the characteristics of contemporary Turkish mosque and its acoustical properties, Proceedings of the 23rd International Congress on Acoustics, pp. 3989–3990, Aachen, Germany.
6. Alusi H.A., Hinchcliffe R., Ingham B., Knight J.J., North C. (1974), Arabic speech audiometry, International Journal of Audiology, 13(3): 212–230.
7. ANSI/ASA S3.2. (2009), Method for measuring the intelligibility of speech over communication systems, American National Standards Institute.
8. Audio Check (n.d.), Online audiogram hearing test, retrieved April 4, 2019, from https://www.audio check.net/testtones_hearingtestaudiogram.php.
9. Aydın T. (2010), The letters in Arabic and Turkish – contrastive analysi [in Turkish: Arapça ve Türkçe’de Sesler – Karsıtsal Çözümleme], EKEV Akademi Dergisi, pp. 321–334.
10. Baktır M. (n.d.), Khutbah [in Turkish: Hutbe], detrieved March 11, 2019, from Turkiye Diyanet Foundation, Encyclopaedia of Islam, https://islamansiklopedisi.org.tr/hutbe.
11. Bilingualism (n.d.), [in:] Cambridge Dictionary, retrieved November 15, 2019, from https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/bilingualism.
12. Bobran H.W. (1973), ABC of sound and heat protection technolog [in German: ABC der Schallund Wärmeschutztechnik: Eine Zusammenstellung der wichtigsten Begriffe des Schallschutzes, der Raumakustik und der Bauphysik. Mit Stoffwerten Konstruktionsdetails, Markennamen-Erläuterung gen sowie umfassendem Firmenverzeichnis], ABC-Redaktion.
13. Bradley J.S. (1986), Predictors of speech ıntelligibility in rooms, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 80(3): 837–845, doi: 10.1121/1.393907.
14. BS 8233 (1999), Sound insulation and noise reduction for buildings – Code of Practice, London, UK.: British Standards Institution.
15. BS EN 60268-16 (2011), Sound system equipment – Part 16: Objective rating of speech intelligibility by speech transmission index, London, UK: British Standard Institute.
16. BS EN ISO 9921 (2003), Ergonomics – Assessment of Speech Communication, British Standards Institution, London, UK.
17. Carvalho A., Freitas C. (2011), Acoustical characterization of the central mosque of Lisbon, Forum Acusticum 2011.
18. ÇGDYY (2010), Environmental Noise Assessment and Management Regulation [in Turkish: Çevresel Gürültünün Degerlendirilmesi ve Yonetimi Yonetmeligi (2002/49/EC)], TC Çevre ve Orman Bakanlıgı, Resmi Gazete.
19. Cirit H. (n.d.), Sermon, [in Turkish: Vaaz], retrieved October 1, 2018, from Turkiye Diyanet Foundation, Encyclopaedia of Islam, https://islamansiklope disi.org.tr/vaaz#.
20. Elkhateeb A., Adas A., Atilla M., Balia Y. (2016), The acoustics of Masjids, looking for future design criteria, [in:] The 23rd International Congress on Sound and Vibration, pp. 10–14, Greece.
21. Erdem A. (1992), A Study on the acoustic characteristics of the Muradiye mosque [in Turkish: Muradiye camii’nin akustik karakteristikleri üzerine bir arastırma], Edirne: Doctoral Thesis, Trakya University.
22. Ez-Züvey A., Hanay N. (2013), The founder of the sound science El-Halil B. AHMED [in Turkish: Ses Bilimin Kurucusu El-Halil B. AHMED], Recep Tayyip Erdogan Üniversitesi Ilahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, 4: 195– 227.
23. Fischer S.R. (2015), History of language [in Turkish: Dilin tarihi], trans. M. Güvenç, Kültür yayınevi. 24. Güler E., Hengirmen M. (2005), Sound science and diction [in Turkish: Ses bilimi ve diksiyon], Engin yayin evi.
25. Hafizah D., Putra A., Noor M.J., Py M.S. (2015), Double layered micro perforated panel as acoustic absorber in mosque, Proceedings of Mechanical Engineering Research Day, pp. 103–104.
26. Harris C.M. (1991), Handbook of Acoustical Measurements and Noise Control, McGraw-Hill.
27. Houtgast T., Steeneken H. (1984), A multilanguage evaluation of the RASTI-method for estimating speech intelligibility in auditoria, Acta Acustica united with Acustica, 54(4): 185–199.
28. Ismail M.R. (2013), A parametric investigation of the acoustical performance of contemporary mosques, Frontiers of Architectural Research, 2(1): 30–41, doi: 10.1016/j.foar.2012.11.002.
29. Karabiber Z. (2000), New Approach to an Ancient Subject: CAHRISMA Project, Proceedings of the 7th ICSV Conference.
30. Karabiber Z., Erdogan S. (2002), Comparison of the acoustical properties of an ancient and recent mosque, Forum Acusticum.
31. Kavraz M. (2014), The acoustic characteristics of the Çarsı Mosque in Trabzon, Turkey, Indoor and Built Environment, 25(1): 128–136, doi: 10.1177/1420 326X14541138.
32. Kayılı M. (1988), Evaluation of acoustic data in Mimar Sinan’s Mosques, Chief Architect Koca Sinan: His Age and Works [in Turkish: Mimar Sinan’ın Camilerindeki Akustik Verilerin Degerlendirilmesi, Mimarbası Koca Sinan: Yasadıgı Çag ve Eserleri], T.C. Basbakanlık Vakıflar Genel Müdürlügü, Istanbul, pp. 545–555.
33. Kayili M. (2005), Acoustic Solutions in classic Ottoman architecture, Foundation for Science, Technology and Civilisation, Publication ID: 4087.
34. Kılıncarslan A.S. (1986), Standardization of phonetically balanced monosyllabic word lists developed for the Turkish language [in Turkish: Türk Diliiçin Gelistirilmis Fonetik Dengeli Tek Heceli Kelime Listelerinin Standardizasyonu], Master Thesis, Hacettepe University, Ankara.
35. Kitapçı K. (2016), Speech ıntelligibility in multilingual spaces, Doctoral Thesis, Heriot-Watt University. 36. Kitapçi K., Galbrun L. (2014), Comparison of speech intelligibility between English, Polish, Arabic and Mandarin, Proceeding of Forum Acusticum, Krakow, Poland.
37. Kuttruff H. (2009), Room Acoustics, 5th ed., CRC Press.
38. Long M. (2006), Architectural Acoustics, Elsevier Academic Press.
39. ODEON, (2015), Odeon Application Note – Auralisation and how to calibrate the sound level for presentations, JHR.
40. Orfali W.A. (2007), Sound parameters in mosque, Proceedings of Meeting on Acoustics, 1(1): 035001, doi: 10.1121/1.2829306.
41. Parkin P.H., Cowell J.R., Humphreys H.R. (1979), Acoustics, Noise, and Buildings, 4th ed., Faber and Faber: Boston MA.
42. Pilancı H. (2011), Turkish phonetics [in Turkish: Türkçe ses bilgisi], Anadolu Üniversitesi basımevi.
43. Presidency of Religious Affairs (2016), 2016 4-B Contracted Islamic Preacher Recruitment (SÖZPER-2016- III) [in Turkish: 2016 Yılı 4-B Sözlesmeli Imam-Hatip Alımı (SÖZPER-2016-III)], Retrieved November 15, 2019, from https://insankaynaklari.diyanet.gov.tr/De tay/315/2016-y%C4%B1l%C4%B1-4-b-s%C3%B6zle %C5%9Fmeli-imam-hatip-al%C4%B1m%C4%B1-(s% C3%B6zper-2016-%C4%B1%C4%B1%C4%B1.
44. Prodi N., Marsilio M. (2003), On the effect of domed ceiling in worship spaces: a scale model study of a mosque, Building Acoustics, 10(2): 117–134, doi: 10.1260/135101003768965979.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Elma Alic
1
Asli Ozcevik Bilen
1

  1. Department of Architecture, Eskisehir Technical University, Eskisehir, Turkey

This page uses 'cookies'. Learn more