Search results

Filters

  • Journals
  • Authors
  • Keywords
  • Date
  • Type

Search results

Number of results: 3
items per page: 25 50 75
Sort by:
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

An alternative for Ordinary Portland cement (OPC) consumption is the production and integration of green cement. In other words, the clinker consumption has to be replaced with new low-carbon binders. A possible solution was introduced by the geopolymerisation technology. However, the alkaline activation of geopolymers offers the possibility of obtaining greener materials with high properties, superior to OPC, but due to the high price of sodium silicate, their industrial use is limited. In the past few years, a new activator has been discovered, namely phosphoric acid. This study approaches the obtaining of coal ash-based geopolymers activated with acid solution cured at room temperature. Accordingly, phosphoric acid, 85% by mass, was diluted in distilled water to obtain a corresponding activation solution for H3PO4/Al2O3 ratio of 1.0 and two types of geopolymers were ambient cured (22°C ±2°C). Moreover, to evaluate the geopolymerisation potential of this system (coal ash – phosphoric acid), SEM and EDS analysis was performed to investigate their morphologic characteristics.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

D.D. Burduhos Nergis
1
ORCID: ORCID
P. Vizureanu
1 2
ORCID: ORCID
S. Lupescu
1
ORCID: ORCID
D.P. Burduhos Nergis
1
ORCID: ORCID
M.C. Perju
1
ORCID: ORCID
A.V. Sandu
1 2
ORCID: ORCID

  1. "Gheorghe Asachi” Technical University of Iasi, Blvd . Mangeron, No. 51, 700050, Iasi, Romania
  2. Universiti Malaysia Perlis (UniMAP), Center of Excellence, Geopolymer & Green Technology (CeGeoGTech), School of Material Engineering, Perlis, Malaysia
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Currently, one of the main challenges of civil engineering and science materials engineers is to develop a sustainable substitute for Ordinary Portland Cement. While the most promising solution is provided by the geopolymerisation technology, most of the studied geopolymers are based on natural raw materials (kaolin). The metakaolin is mainly preferred because of its rapid rate of dissolution in the activator solution, easy control of the Si/Al ratio, and white color. However, its high cost prevents it from being widely used in geopolymer composites or other materials that can become an industrial alternative for Ordinary Portland Cement. Several studies have shown that geopolymers with good performance can also be obtained from secondary raw materials (industrial wastes such as coal ash or slag). This explains why countries with rapidly developing economies are so interested in this technology. These countries have significant amounts of industrial waste and lack a well-developed recycling infrastructure. Therefore, the use of these by-products for geopolymers manufacturing could solve a waste problem while simultaneously lowering virgin raw material consumption. This study evaluates the effect of replacing different amounts of coal ash with sand on the microstructure of sintered geopolymers. Accordingly, scanning electron microscopy and energy dispersive X-ray analysis were involved to highlight the morphological particularities of room-cured and sintered geopolymers.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

D.D. Burduhos-Nergis
1
ORCID: ORCID
P. Vizureanu
1 2
ORCID: ORCID
D.C. Achitei
1
ORCID: ORCID
A.V. Sandu
1 3
ORCID: ORCID
D.P. Burduhos-Nergis
1
ORCID: ORCID
M.M.A.B. Abdullah
4 5
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Gheorghe Asachi Technical University of Iasi, Faculty of Materials Science and Engineering, D. Mangeron 41, 700050 Iasi, Romania
  2. Technical Sciences Academy of Romania, Dacia Blvd 26, 030167 Bucharest, Romania
  3. Romanian Inventors Forum, St. P. Movila 3, 700089 Iasi, Romania
  4. Centre of Excellence Geopolymer and Green Technology (CEGeoGTech), Universiti Malaysia Perlis (UniMAP), Arau 02600, Perlis, Malaysia
  5. Universiti Malaysia Perlis (UniMAP), Faculty of Chemical Engineering Technology, Arau 02600, Perlis, Malaysia
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

This article deals with the effect of selected machining parameter values in hard turning of tested OCHN3MFA steel in terms of SEM microstructural analysis of workpiece material, cutting forces, long-term tests, and SEM observations of flank wear VB and crater wear KT of used changeable coated cemented carbide cutting inserts in the processes of performed experiments. OCHN3MFA steel was selected as an experimental (workpiece) material. The selected experimental steel was analyzed prior to hard turning tests to check the initial microstructure of bulk material and subsurface microstructure after hard turning and chemical composition. Study of workpiece material’s microstructure and worn cemented carbide cutting inserts was performed with Tescan Vega TS 5135 scanning electron microscope (SEM) with the X-Ray microanalyzer Noran Six/300. The chemical composition of workpiece material was analyzed with Tasman Q4 surface analyzer. All hard turning experiments of the used specimens were performed under the selected machining parameters in the SU 50A machine tool with the 8th selected individual geometry of coated cementite carbide cutting inserts clamped in the appropriate DCLNR 2525M12-M type of cutting tool holder. During the hard turning technological process of the individual tested samples made of OCHN3MFA steel, cutting forces were measured with a Kistler 9257B piezoelectric dynamometer, with their subsequent evaluation using Dynoware software. After the long-term testing, other experiments and results were also realized, evaluating the influence of selected machining parameters with different cutting insert geometry on the achieved surface quality.
Go to article

Bibliography

  1.  G. Sun, R. Zhou, J. Lu, and J. Mazumder, “Evaluation of defect density, microstructure, residual stress, elastic modulus, hardness and strength of laser-deposited AISI 4340 steel,” Acta Mater., vol. 84, pp. 172–189, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2014.09.028.
  2.  A.K. Sahoo and B. Sahoo, “Experimental investigations on machinability aspects in finish hard turning of AISI 4340 steel using uncoated and multilayer coated carbide inserts,” Measurement, vol. 45, no. 8, pp. 2153–2165, 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.measurement.2012.05.015.
  3.  R. Lalbondre, P. Krishna, and G.C. Mohankumar, “Machinability Studies of Low Alloy Steels by Face Turning Method: An Experimental Investigation,” Procedia Eng., vol. 64, pp. 632–641, 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2013.09.138.
  4.  Ş. Baday, H. Başak, and A. Güral, “Analysis of spheroidized AISI 1050 steel in terms of cutting forces and surface quality,” Met. Mater., vol. 54, no. 05, pp. 315–320, 2016, doi: 10.4149/km_2016_5_315.
  5.  R. Meyer, J. Köhler, and B. Denkena, “Influence of the tool corner radius on the tool wear and process forces during hard turning,” Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., vol. 58, no. 9–12, pp. 933–940, 2011, doi: 10.1007/s00170-011-3451-y.
  6.  M.S.H. Bhuiyan, I.A. Choudhury, and M. Dahari, “Monitoring the tool wear, surface roughness and chip formation occurrences using multiple sensors in turning,” J. Manuf. Syst., vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 476–487, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.jmsy.2014.04.005.
  7.  L.H. Maia, A.M. Abrao, W.L. Vasconcelos, W.F. Sales, and A.R. Machado, “A new approach for detection of wear mechanisms and determination of tool life in turning using acoustic emission,” Tribol. Int., vol. 92, pp. 519–532, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.triboint.2015.07.024.
  8.  A. Cakan, F. Evrendilek, and V. Ozkaner, “Data-driven simulations of flank wear of coated cutting tools in hard turning,” Mechanics, vol. 21, no. 6, 2016, doi: 10.5755/j01.mech.21.6.12199.
  9.  W.B. Rashid, S. Goel, J.P. Davim, and S.N. Joshi, “Parametric design optimization of hard turning of AISI 4340 steel (69 HRC),” Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., vol. 82, no. 1‒4, pp. 451–462, 2015, doi: 10.1007/s00170-015-7337-2.
  10.  G. Bartarya and S.K. Choudhury, “State of the art in hard turning,” Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf., vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 1–14, 2012, doi: 10.1016/j. ijmachtools.2011.08.019.
  11.  W. Jiang and A.P. Malshe, “A novel cBN composite coating design and machine testing: A case study in turning,” Surf. Coat. Technol., vol. 206, no. 2‒3, pp. 273–279, 2011, doi: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2011.07.008.
  12.  B.D. Beake, J.F. Smith, A. Gray, G.S. Fox-Rabinovich, S.C. Veldhuis, and J.L. Endrino, “Investigating the correlation between nano-impact fracture resistance and hardness/modulus ratio from nanoindentation at 25–500°C and the fracture resistance and lifetime of cutting tools with Ti1−xAlxN (x  = 0.5 and 0.67) PVD coatings in milling operations,” Surf. Coat. Technol., vol. 201, no. 8, pp. 4585–4593, 2007, doi: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2006.09.118.
  13.  A. Cakan, “Real-time monitoring of flank wear behavior of ceramic cutting tool in turning hardened steels,” Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., vol. 52, no. 9‒12, pp. 897–903, 2010, doi: 10.1007/s00170-010-2793-1.
  14.  J. Jaworski and T. Trzepieciński, “Research on durability of turning tools made of low-alloy high-speed steels,” Met. Mater., vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 17–25, 2016, doi: 10.4149/km_2016_1_17.
  15.  W. Zebala, “Tool stiffness influence on the hosen physical parameters on the milling process,” Bull. Pol. Acad. Sci. Tech. Sci., vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 597–604, 2012, doi: 10.2478/v10175-012-0071-0.
  16.  P. Raja, R. Malajamuthi, and M. Sakthivel “Experimental investigation of cryogenically treated HSS tool in turning AISI1045 using fuzzy logic Taguchi approach,” Bull. Pol. Acad. Sci. Tech. Sci., vol. 67, no. 4, pp. 687–696, 2019, doi: 10.24425/bpasts. 2019.130178.
  17.  J. Waszko, “Laser surface remelting of powder metallurgy high speed steel,” Bull. Pol. Acad. Sci. Tech. Sci., vol. 68, no.  6, pp. 1425–1432, 2021, doi: 10.24425/bpasts.2020.135385.
  18.  I. Barényi et al., “Material and technological investigation of machined surfaces of the OCHN3MFA steel,” Met. Mater., vol. 57, no. 02, pp. 131–142, 2020, doi: 10.4149/km_2019_1_131.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Jozef Majerík
1
Igor Barényi
1
Zdenek Pokorný
2
Josef Sedlák
3
Vlastimil Neumann
4
David Dobrocký
2
Aleš Jaroš
3
Michal Krbaťa
1
Jaroslav Jambor
1
Roman Kusenda
1
Miroslav Sagan
1
Jiri Procházka
2

  1. Department of Engineering, Alexander Dubcek University of Trencin, Trencin, Slovak Republic
  2. Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Defence in Brno, Brno, Czech Republic
  3. Department of Manufacturing Technology, Brno University of Technology, Brno, Czech Republic
  4. Department of Combat and Special Vehicles, University of Defence in Brno, Brno, Czech Republic

This page uses 'cookies'. Learn more