Search results

Filters

  • Journals
  • Authors
  • Keywords
  • Date
  • Type

Search results

Number of results: 7
items per page: 25 50 75
Sort by:
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

In contrast to Antarctica, the Arctic was for a long time deprived of an adequate system of multilateral international scientific cooperation. That gap was filled in 1990 by the foundation of a non-governmental International Arctic Science Committee (IASC). In this article, the origin, structure, operation and perspectives of that Committee are presented.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Jacek Machowski
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

In this article, Svalbard was presented as place and object of intensive scientific research, carried on under the rule of the 1920 Spitsbergen Treaty, which has transformed the archipelago into a unique political and legal entity, having no counterpart anywhere else in the world. Scientific activities in Svalbard are carried out within an uncommon legal framework, shaped by a body of instruments both of international law and domestic laws of Norway, as well as other countries concerned, while the Spitsbergen Treaty, in despite of its advanced age of 75 years, still remains a workable international instrument, fundamental to the maintenance of law and order within the whole Arctic region. In 1995 two important for Svalbard anniversaries were noted: on 9 February, 75 years of the signing of the Spitsbegren Treaty and on 14 August, 70 years of the Norwegian rule over the archipelago.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Jacek Machowski
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

For many years, the Polish Academy of Sciences has been undertaking activities aimed at increasing the international importance of Polish scientific research by establishing cooperation with international scientific institutions and supporting the participation of Polish scientists in international research programs. Currently, the Polish Academy of Sciences has six scientific centers abroad – in Paris, Rome, Vienna, Berlin, Brussels and Kiev. These institutions have different origins. The oldest ones, in Rome and Paris, continue the tradition of Polish emigration from the 19th century. These traditions are also referred to by the much younger station in Vienna, which to some extent has continued the activities of Polish diaspora organizations operating in this area since the beginning of the 20th century. The centers in Berlin and Kiev are relatively young. The first was established in 1996 as the Representation of the German Academic Exchange Service and transformed in 2006 into the Historical Research Center of the Polish Academy of Sciences in Berlin. The youngest of the centers has been operating in Kiev since 2013 under the name of the Representation “Polish Academy of Sciences” in Kiev. The Office for the Promotion of Science PolSCA in Brussels, established in 2006, has a different character. Due to its location, the specificity of this facility consists in developing scientific and scientific-technical cooperation through the promotion and expert support of Polish partners in the framework programs of the European Union. The activities of these institutions emphasize the presence of science, culture and intellectual achievements of Poland in the European research area, which is important for building the image of our country abroad. The Polish Academy of Sciences scientific centers are therefore a kind of scientific attaché of the Republic of Poland, the more so as Polish embassies in these six countries do not have such an attaché. The article analyzes the administrative, financial and legal conditions of the station's operation and the expectations towards their substantive activity from the point of view of the Academy's management.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Roman Słowiński
1

  1. Polska Akademia Nauk, wiceprezes
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

This volume, a collection of articles by Svetlana Tolstaya, is representative of the Moscow ethnolinguistic school, whose main goal (as was the intention of its founder, Nikita I. Tolstoy) is to reconstruct the spiritual ancestry of Slavs from both historical data and contemporary dialectological and ethnographic records. The rich and varied achievements of the Moscow ethnolinguistic school and specifically Svetlana Tolstaya are reviewed here, along with her contribution to building Polish‑Russian scholarly cooperation. The examples of mir, sud'ba, *svojь are used to illustrate the advantages of the analytical method employed by the author, i.e. semantic reconstruction within semantic microfields.
Go to article

Bibliography

Bartmiński J., 1992, Nikita Iljicz Tołstoj i program etnolingwistyki historycznej, „Etnolingwistyka”, 5, s. 7–13.
Bartmiński J., 1998, Dynamika polskiego pojęcia ojczyzny, „Prace Filologiczne”, t. 43, s. 53–60.
Bartmiński J., 2000, Polska dola, rosyjska sud’ba, „Etnolingwistyka”, 12, s. 25–37.
Boryś W., 2005, Słownik etymologiczny języka polskiego, Kraków.
Brückner A., 1997/2000, Słownik etymologiczny języka polskiego, t. 1, Kraków.
Czyżewski F., 2010, Związki lubelsko‑moskiewskie z pozycji dialektologa, „Etnolingwistyka”, 22, s. 260–262.
Gołąb Z., 2004, O pochodzeniu Słowian w świetle faktów językowych, tłum. z ang. M. Wojtyła‑Świerzowska, Kraków.
Lühr R., 2010, Wertbegriffe in indogermanischen Sprachen Europas, [in:] Würde – dignité – godność – dignity. Die Menschenwürde im internationalen Vergleich, hg. von Ch. Baumbach, P. Kunstmann, München, S. 41–76.
Milewski T., 1993, O pochodzeniu słowiańskich imion złożonych, [w:] idem, Teoria, typologia i historia języka, Kraków, s. 226–237.
Niebrzegowska‑Bartmińska S., 2020, Definiowanie i profilowanie pojęć w (etno) lingwistyce, Lublin.
Ponyatiye sud'by 1994 = Ponyatiye sud'by v kontekste razlichnykh kul'tur, ed. N.D. Arutyunova, Moskva.
Rzetelska‑Feleszko E., 2006, W świecie nazw własnych, Warszawa ; Kraków.
Tekstologia 2009 = Bartmiński J., Niebrzegowska‑Bartmińska S., Tekstologia, Warszawa.
Tolstaya S.M., 1989, Ustnyy tekst v yazyke i kul'ture, [w:] Tekst ustny – texte oral. Struktura i pragmatyka – problemy semantyki – ustność w literaturze, red. M. Abramowicz, J.Bartmiński, Wrocław 1989, s. 76–79.
Tolstaya S.M., 1994, «Glagol'nost'» sud'by i ikh korrelyaty v yazyke kul'tury, [in:] Ponyatiye sud'by v kontekste razlichnykh kul'tur, ed. N.D. Arutyunova, Moskva.
Tolstaya S.M., 1998, Morfonologiya v strukture slavyanskikh yazykov, Moskva.
Tolstaya S.M., 2005, Polesskiy narodnyy kalendar', Moskva.
Tolstaya S.M., 2006, Postulaty moskovskoy lingvistiki, „Etnolingwistyka”, 18, s. 7–28.
Tolstaya S.M., 2008, Prostranstvo slova: leksicheskaya semantika v obshcheslavyanskoy perspektive, Moskva.
Tolstaya S.M., 2010, Semanticheskiye kategorii yazyka kul'tury: ocherki po slavyanskoy etnolingvistike, Moskva.
Tolstaya S.M., 2013, Russkaya chest' i pol'skiy honor, „Etnolingwistyka”, 25, s. 9–21.
Tolstaya S.M., 2015, Obraz mira v tekste i rituale, Moskva.
Tolstaya S.M., 2019, Mir cheloveka v zerkale yazyka. Ocherki po slavyanskomu yazykoznaniyu i etnolingvistike, Moskva.
Tolstoy N.I., 1969, Slavyanskaya geograficheskaya terminologiya. Semasiologicheskiye etyudy, Moskva.
Tołstaja S.M., 1992, Tekst ustny w języku i kulturze, tłum. W. Fal, „Etnolingwistyka”, 5, s. 27–31.
Wierzbicka A., 1991, Język i naród. Polski los i rosyjska sud’ba, „Teksty Drugie : teoria literatury, krytyka, interpretacja” nr 3 (9), s. 5–20.
Wierzbicka A., 1992, Fate and Destny, [in:] eadem, Semantics, culture, and cognition. Universal human concepts in culture‑specific configurations, Oxford 1992, s. 65–116.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Jerzy Bartmiński
1 2
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Instytut Filologii Polskiej UMCS, Lublin
  2. Instytut Slawistyki PAN, Warszawa
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The aim of the article is to present the activities of foreign scientific centres of the Polish Academy of Sciences on the examples of three out of six operating centers: the center in Vienna, Paris and the Polish Science Contact Agency PolSCA PAN in Brussels. The authors of the article combine their own experiences of the former directors of the centers: in Vienna, Paris and Brussels to reflect critically on the place and role of these centers in the scientific-research area. They point to centers’ enormous and diverse potential for disseminating and promoting the achievements of scientists, not fully recognized and used by the scientific community. Taking into account the specifics of each institution, the authors describe the ways of optimal use of their cultural and social capital, and identify common structural problems they encountered during their tenure. The article consists of the following elements: an introduction, an extensive authorial analysis of each station's activities, prepared in the form of a case study and a summary with conclusions.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Bogusław Dybaś
Maciej Forycki
Małgorzata Molęda-Zdziech
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The article is intended to be an appendix to an earlier discussion on the activities of the foreign scientific centres of the Polish Academy of Sciences (“Nauka” 4/2020 and 2/2021). It presents another case study, namely the centre situated in Rome – one of the eldest Polish centres abroad – its historical background and heritage as well as its recent activities. It points out also some actual present problems and challenges in order to stimulate a broader debate on how the PAS foreign centres could be better used to promote and disseminate the achievements of Polish researchers.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Piotr Salwa
1
ORCID: ORCID

  1. dyrektor Stacji Naukowej PAN w Rzymie w latach 2013–2020
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Through this article, the current director of the PolSCA Office in Brussels (Dr. Tomasz Poprawka) and former director of the PAS Scientific Center in Paris (Dr. Kamil Szafrański) share their reflections and thus contribute to the discussion on the functioning and role of foreign centers of the Polish Academy of Sciences. In response to the article co-authored by the former directors of the PAS stations in Vienna, Paris and Brussels – in which they initiated the debate – the authors present their own perspective on a vision of the balanced operation of the stations in three key areas: the action plan, administrative support and communication. Having in mind an effective operation of the PAS centers abroad, the authors wish to share their ideas, based on the experience to date. These include strengthening of the stations in the future, taking up new challenges and searching for innovative solutions for their continuous development, thus meaningfully contributing to the promotion of Polish science abroad. At the same time, the authors declare their willingness to take part in further discussions on the role and operationality of the Academy’s scientific centers abroad. This publication consists of the following elements: introduction, discussion of issues related to science diplomacy, lobbying and advocacy of interests, analysis of administrative issues, an outline of aspects of internal communication and external dissemination, and a summary.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Tomasz Poprawka
1
Kamil Szafrański
2

  1. Biuro Promocji Nauki PolSCA w Brukseli
  2. Stacja Naukowa PAN w Paryżu do czerwca 2021

This page uses 'cookies'. Learn more