Material of tesseraspids (Tesseraspidiformes) is reported from the uppermost Severnaya Zemlya Formation
(Lochkovian, Lower Devonian) of the Severnaya Zemlya archipelago, in the Russian Arctic, where it is associated
with other vertebrate remains, including corvaspids, acanthodians, and large but rare specimens of
osteostracans. The tesseraspid material is not abundant, and most often preserved as a “patchwork” of bony
platelets (tesserae), except for a few partly articulated specimens. We redescribe the holotype of Tesseraspis
mosaica Karatajūtė-Talimaa, 1983, whose head carapace is preserved as a flattened tube of adjacent tesserae.
This material is compared to the already published tesseraspid taxa, i.e., T. tessellata Wills, 1935, T. toombsi
Tarlo, 1964, T. mutabilis (Brotzen, 1934), T. oervigi Tarlo, 1964 emend. Dineley and Loeffler, 1976, T. denisoni
Tarlo, 1964, and T. talimaae Tarlo, 1965. All species are based upon rare and incomplete material, as no
head carapaces associated with trunk and tail are known, and so, the intraspecific variability is also unknown.
Distinction between “species” is based on the detail of the superficial sculpture of the tesserae of the head carapaces,
which is unsatisfactory. It is concluded that only four of the nominal species can be retained. A review
of all other known tessellated pteraspidomorphs indicates that our knowledge of tessellated heterostracans is
currently insufficient to support a meaningful classification.
The paper concerns the problem of treatment of the systematic effect as a part of the coverage interval associated with the measurement result. In this case the known systematic effect is not corrected for but instead is treated as an uncertainty component. This effect is characterized by two components: systematic and random. The systematic component is estimated by the bias and the random component is estimated by the uncertainty associated with the bias. Taking into consideration these two components, a random variable can be created with zero expectation and standard deviation calculated by randomizing the systematic effect. The method of randomization of the systematic effect is based on a flatten-Gaussian distribution. The standard uncertainty, being the basic parameter of the systematic effect, may be calculated with a simple mathematical formula. The presented evaluation of uncertainty is more rational than those with the use of other methods. It is useful in practical metrological applications.
The technology for gob-side entry retaining in steep coal seams is still in the development stage. The
analysis results of the caving structure of main roof, low influence of gateway’s stability because of long
filling distance and weak dynamic effect of the gateway, and the low stress redistribution environment
indicate that using this technology in steep coal seams has significant advantages. Moreover, to reinforce
the waste rock and the soft floor and to better guard against the impact of the waste rock during natural
filling, a rock blocking device and grouting reinforcement method were invented, and theoretical calculations
result show that the blocking device has high safety factor. In addition, we also developed a set of
hydraulic support devices for use in the strengthening support zone. Furthermore, because the retaining
gateway was a systematic project, the selection of the size and shape of the gateway cross section and its
support method during the initial driving stage is a key step. Thus, first, a section the size of bottom width
and roof height of a new gateway was determined to meet any related requirements. Then, according
to the cross sections of 75 statistical gateways and the support technique, it chosen a trapezoidal cross
section when the dip of the coal seam is 35° < α ≤ 45°, a special and an inclined arch cross section when
45° < α ≤ 55°. Eventually, a support system of bolts and cables combined with steel mesh and steel belts
was provided. The support system used optimized material and improved parameters, can enhanced the
self-bearing ability of the surrounding coal and rock masses.